haiku #6 (2014)

mini cyclone
swirls in my yard –
leaves moving in circles

 

© Ron Sparks

haiku #5 (2014)

white knuckled grip –
first time fliers watch
the wings de-ice

 

© Ron Sparks

haiku #4 (2014)

left on the ice
a broken hockey stick
— weak winter sun

© Ron Sparks

haiku #3 (2014)

the rocket launch;
inside Orion
a new star

© Ron Sparks

 

http://www.kennedyspacecenter.com/events/2014/january/launch-atlas5-tdrsl.aspx

 

haiku #2 (2014)

glass on the pond —
the koi still swim
under the ice

© Ron Sparks

haiku #1 (2014)

yours has frost
yet mine has none;
— the wolf moon

© Ron Sparks

Sturgis 2013 Photo Gallery

I took a lot of photos on my journey from Orlando, Florida to Sturgis, South Dakota.  Enjoy.  Click on any thumbnail to see the full picture.

End of Day 2

End of Day 2

Duck Dynasty's Phil Robertson

Why this Liberal is Not Offended by the Duck Commander’s Opinion On Homosexuality

Phil Robertson from the popular A&E show Duck Dynasty set the world ablaze this week because of his statements about homosexuals, promiscuity, and black people.  His remarks concerned A&E significantly enough for them to pull him from the show indefinitely.

This is what Phil Robertson said on homosexuality:

Start with homosexual behavior and just morph out from there. Bestiality, sleeping around with this woman and that woman and that woman and those men.  Don’t be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers—they won’t inherit the kingdom of God. Don’t deceive yourself. It’s not right.

The Left has decried this as insensitive and homophobic.  Liberals are calling his statement crude, rough, and inappropriate; and they agree that A&E took the right action.  After all, in this day and age the only thing we should never tolerate is intolerance, right?

The Right has supported Robertson’s statements as his right and accused people of attacking Christianity.  Most on the conservative, Christian, side applaud Robertson’s opinion.  There is a raging debate over the scriptures Robertson used and if he interpreted them correctly.  There are cries of persecution.  Most on the conservative Right believe A&E should not have done anything about Robertson’s statements and are offended that they did so.

This issue, in a nutshell, summarizes the current polarized sociopolitical environment in the United State right now.   People getting overly offended for reasons that, if they sat down and thought about it, are the wrong reasons to be upset.  The claims of closed-mindedness (from the left) and accusations of restricting of religious expression (from the right) creates a chasm between both that is impossible to navigate.  And it’s all distraction, people; a red herring.  This isn’t about religion or freedom from it.  It’s not even about tolerance or intolerance.

His Opinion is Wrong, in My Opinion, but that doesn’t matter

Everyone knows I, personally, support LGBT equality and defend vigorously the right for everyone, regardless of race, color, creed, or orientation to be treated equally under law.  And that’s the clincher – “under law.”  Phil Robertson’s personal remarks are indicative of nothing more than his personal views and have no bearing on law.  His belief is based on his religion, but he is not using his religion to persecute you.  Stating his opinion is not an attack.

He has an opinion, like my grandmother does, that homosexuality is a sin.  If I don’t like that opinion I can walk away or not watch him.

I think Phil Robertson’s opinion is a misinformed opinion.  I think it is WRONG.  But I will fight to the death Phil’s right to have that opinion.  It is his to have and his to share.  This is what America is about, people.  He thinks homosexuality is a sin based on his religion.  He says so.  I disagree.  End of discussion.

But It’s Not Homophobia

It is not a homophobic statement either.  Homophobia is an extreme or irrational fear of homosexuality and homosexual behavior.  There’s nothing extreme about his opinion.  It is a belief consistent with his religion; shared by hundreds of millions of people.  Regardless of my personal belief, this does not qualify as extreme or irrational.  His statement is, therefore, not homophobic.

I had premarital sex.  That’s a sin in the bible as well.  My grandparents did not approve and they said so.  They don’t have an irrational fear of premarital sex; they just don’t approve of it.  It did not stop me from having premarital sex.

I’m pretty sure Phil Robertson’s statements won’t stop anyone from being gay, since being gay is not a choice.

This Issues is of Speech and Consequences

In this case, the Right is more correct than the Left – but for the wrong reasons.  Highlighting our national polarization, both sides are assuming righteous and morals position on the issue.  There is a secular/religious battle going on over Phil’s statements – AND THAT IS THE WRONG ARGUMENT.  It is the giant red herring in the room.

Seriously folks – this is an issue of free speech and the consequences of it, not the right to be religious or the right to be free from it.  Phil has the right to say anything he wants – and A&E has the right to do with it what they will.  It’s not a religious issue.  Two entities, one a person and one a corporation, having a difference of opinion.  A dispute that has made its way onto the national stage where the court of public opinion rages impotently and for the wrong reasons.  It’s become some twisted rally cry for both the Right and the Left.

If I walked up to any American, bar none, and asked if they should be allowed to have an opinion regardless of the popularity of that opinion – they would all agree vociferously with that they should.  They agree – until someone actually expresses an unpopular opinion, it seems.  Don’t equivocate and say some opinions are inexcusable – because then you get into thought policing.

Come on people – it’s the opinion of one man and the response of one entity.  It’s not that big of a deal.  I am not upset at Phil Robertson for his opinion; it is consistent with his life and his beliefs.  I may not agree with it, but I respect his right to have it and to share it.  And he has to deal with and accept the consequences of his publicly stated opinion.

Stop drawing moral and religious battle lines on a protected constitutional right you all agree with.  There is never a better time to defend free speech as there is when someone speaks an unpopular opinion.

This is a boon for Duck Dynasty and A&E

A&E is a business trying to make money.  Phil Robertson knows this and knows that there is no loyalty when the dollar is threatened.  He chose to get in bed with the network – he has to deal with the conditions of that and the consequences and repercussions of his actions in their eyes.

Last parting thought – A&E is in the business of profit.  Have any of you stopped to think how much this just boosted the ratings and viewership of Duck Dynasty in particular and A&E shows in general?  I wouldn’t be surprised if this entire debacle was staged.

Surrender (Poem)

Surrender

she lies on the bed facing me
the curve of her hips
giving shape to the
blankets

her bare shoulder and arm are
bent at a gentle angle
as she lightly runs her
fingers
through my hair
her tattoos a vibrant
splash
of color on her alabaster skin

half lidded eyes take me in
and she sighs, a Mona Lisa
smile
on her lips

A million thoughts run through my
mind, my manic mind,
while she caresses me in complacent
bliss

How did I end up here
with this woman
with her perfect peace contrasting my
inferior and harmful
psychosis –
my constant battle with myself
and the universe

How can she love me
a man
who screams in defiance
at the tempest
while she spreads her
arms wide
and turns her face into the
rain and glories in it

My thoughts swirl
and clash
with the outward serenity
of the bedroom

And this is normal for me

The surprise comes when,
in a single moment
of clarity,
in between one manic thought
and the next,
I sigh with her
release the knot in my chest –
say “fuck it” and
kiss her eyelids

I join her in this
perfect
moment of contentment

even as she wonders at my
sudden exclamation

(c) 2013  Ron Sparks

 

(dedicated to my beautiful wife)

Touring Motorcycles Suck

I despise touring motorcycles.

In Florida these are, by far, the most common motorcycle you see on the road, almost always manned by a middle-aged man looking pretty damned smug and sure of himself.  Why do I despise them so much?  Let me iterate through my reasons:

  1. They are almost always ridden by middle-aged men going through a mid-life crisis who want to regain the freedom and rebelliousness of youth, but with an extra-comfy seat for their aging prostate.
  2. They are over-priced.  The highway bars, the sissy bars, the extra wide seats, the windshields, the built-in radios, and fairings add a lot of unnecessary dollars to the bike – making them status symbols for  middle-class, over-the-hill, men to compare against one another.
  3. They aren’t used for touring!  Seriously – look at the image above.  I snapped it today on my way home from work.  Almost universally, these “touring bikes” are towed to their final destination and used for local riding only.  This is the most hypocritical part of the entire debacle.  The only valid touring bikes I have ever seen were on my 5,000 mile trip to Sturgis and back.
  4. You don’t need an over-priced touring bike to tour.  Seriously.  I am a middle-aged, middle-class biker who has been riding bikes for about 25 years.  I just went 5,000 miles on my bike in less than 2 weeks.  Without a windshield.  Without fairings.  Without hard saddle bags.  Without highway bars.  Check out the image below.
  5. Most guys on these touring bikes don’t know how to handle a bike of that size.  They are a danger to themselves and everyone on the road with them.  The bike is heavy, bulky, and difficult to maneuver.
  6. Lastly, for me, these bikes kill the spirit of being a biker.  They are essentially convertibles on two wheels.  Being a biker is not about the accessories, but about chasing the wind.  And these touring bikes do everything they can to take the wind out of the ride – and that, more than anything else, is the unforgivable flaw in a touring bike.

 

You don't need a touring bike to tour

  1. You don’t need a touring bike to tour